For investors navigating the complex world of asset allocation, understanding how different asset classes move in relation to one another is paramount. Correlation analysis provides a crucial lens through which to view these relationships, helping to inform diversification strategies and risk management.
In this post, we delve deep into the correlation matrix of several key stock indices, data from Jan 2012 to Feb 2025, with a particular focus on the FTSE ST REIT Index and the iEdge S-REIT Index, both barometers of the Singapore Real Estate Investment Trust (S-REITs) market. By examining their historical co-movements with regional and global equities and bonds, as well as other REIT benchmarks, we aim to provide insightful perspectives for investors considering exposure to S-REITs sector.
Our analysis begins with the remarkable correlation of 0.99 between the FTSE ST REIT Index and the iEdge S-REIT Index. This near-perfect alignment suggests that both indices, despite potentially having minor differences in their construction, effectively capture the performance of the same underlying universe: S-REITs listed on the Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX). For practical purposes, their behavior relative to other asset classes will be strikingly similar.
When we look at the relationship with the broader Asia ex Japan REITs (represented by the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Asia ex Japan Index), the correlation remains exceptionally high at 0.96 for the FTSE ST REIT and 0.98 for the iEdge S-REIT. This intimate connection underscores the significant influence of regional factors on S-REITs. Economic growth within Asia (excluding Japan), the monetary policies of Asian central banks, and overall investor sentiment towards the Asian real estate market appear to be key drivers affecting the performance of S-REITs.
The correlation with Asia ex Japan Equities (represented by MSCI Asia ex Japan Index) stands at a moderate positive level (FTSE ST REIT: 0.49, iEdge S-REIT: 0.56). This suggests that while S-REITs and broader Asian equities tend to move in the same general direction, their relationship is not as tightly bound as within the REIT sector. Broader economic sentiment and risk appetite in the region likely play a role, but the unique drivers of equity performance (corporate earnings, technological advancements) and REIT performance (rental yields, occupancy rates) can lead to periods of divergence.
Against Asia Bonds (represented by JP Morgan Asia Credit Index), the correlation weakens to a low to moderate positive range (FTSE ST REIT: 0.32, iEdge S-REIT: 0.41). While both asset classes can be influenced by regional economic conditions and interest rate movements, the direct relationship is less pronounced. Lower interest rates can be beneficial for both, but the specific factors driving bond yields (credit spreads, inflation expectations) and REIT performance can differ.
The relationship with US REITs (represented by MSCI US REIT Index) reveals a low to moderate positive correlation (FTSE ST REIT: 0.38, iEdge S-REIT: 0.46). This indicates that while both represent real estate investment trusts, their performance is largely shaped by their respective domestic market conditions. Local economic factors, property market dynamics, and regulatory environments in Singapore and the United States tend to be more influential than global REIT trends.
Interestingly, the correlation with US Equities (represented by S&P 500 Index) is remarkably low, hovering near zero (FTSE ST REIT: -0.03, iEdge S-REIT: 0.08). This near-absence of a linear relationship highlights the distinct nature of S-REITs and the broad US equity market. The drivers of US equity performance (corporate earnings, technological innovation, global economic growth) have historically had little direct impact on the performance of S-REITs sector, which is more closely tied to local real estate dynamics and interest rates.
Against US Bonds (represented by Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Index), the correlation strengthens to a moderate positive level (FTSE ST REIT: 0.45, iEdge S-REIT: 0.53). US interest rates can exert influence on global financial conditions, affecting the attractiveness of income-generating assets like REITs. When US bond yields decline, the relative appeal of REIT yields may increase, and vice versa. However, local domestic factors remain crucial determinants of S-REIT performance.
When compared to the broader Global REIT market (represented by FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REITs Index), S-REITs exhibit a moderate positive correlation (FTSE ST REIT: 0.46, iEdge S-REIT: 0.54). This suggests that while global trends in real estate and interest rates have some bearing, the performance of S-REITs is more strongly anchored to local and regional factors compared to the diverse constituents of the global REIT index.
Similar to the relationship with US equities, the correlation with Global Equities (represented by MSCI ACWI Index) is weak (FTSE ST REIT: 0.04, iEdge S-REIT: 0.14). This reinforces the idea that the broad global equity market, driven by a multitude of factors across various countries and sectors, has a limited direct influence on the specific performance of S-REITs.
Finally, against Global Bonds (represented by Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index), we observe a moderate to strong positive correlation (FTSE ST REIT: 0.66, iEdge S-REIT: 0.70). This suggests a more pronounced relationship compared to global equities, likely reflecting the shared sensitivity of income-generating assets like REITs and bonds to global interest rate movements and overall market sentiment towards risk and yield.
While historical correlations provide valuable insights, it's crucial to remember that these relationships are not static. Shifting global economic conditions, evolving monetary policies, and unforeseen market events can alter these correlations over time. Investors should continuously monitor these dynamics and consider the underlying economic rationale behind these relationships.
In conclusion, understanding the correlation landscape of Singapore REITs provides crucial context for investors seeking to build well-diversified portfolios. Their strong regional ties, limited direct relationship with global equities, and sensitivity to interest rates paint a picture of an asset class with its own unique set of drivers and potential diversification benefits. As always, thorough research and consideration of individual investment objectives are paramount when making asset allocation decisions.
| Exclusive REITsavvy Newsletter |